Friday, November 9, 2007

Assessment Practices

This week we discussed the topic of assessment. The use of standardized tests is the most commonly used method for assessing the progress of the students. As England said, these tests are dangerous. Often the students feel a great deal of pressure while taking these exams, enough pressure to make them lose focus and perform poorly. I know from my own experience, I was never able to eat breakfast on the day of standardized testing because I would literally be sick to my stomach with nerves. The lack of food, and the stress of finishing on time made it hard for me to concentrate. I think that the idea of standardized testing is not bad, but the way they are implemented is. They do allow comparisons to be made between different students. If there was a way in which the stress could be taken away from standardized testing, I feel they could be beneficial. If changes were made in the ways they were administered, I think that would be helpful. Instead of taking these tests in gymnasiums filled with a hundred other students, we can administer these tests in smaller classrooms. We also discussed the possibility of finding an alternative to standardized testing. I think that finding a feasible alternative will be challenging. We discussed the use of portfolios which seem to have many advantages, but I feel that it could be very time consuming for the teachers. I like the idea of providing students with different options for projects. One student can write a paper, while another creates a work of art, or another writes a song. This is a good idea because students are able to show their understanding of the material in a manner that bests suits them. This article talks about the issue of standardized testing and possible alternatives. We also discussed the different learning styles and multiple intelligences that students have. Some learning better visually, while others learn better through first hand experience. It should be the teachers job to prepare lessons that effectively teach all of the students. I think that this would be challenging but not impossible. The teacher can prepare a slide show presentation which would help the visual learners, while explaining it in detail for those who learn better with words. Afterwards the teacher can prepare an activity in which the students are able to learn through their own experiences in order to better understand the material. I think if teachers take the time to create these lessons plans, it will greatly benefit their students and allow them to perform to the best of their ability. We also discussed the admissions process for certain schools described by Kozol. I never had the opportunity to choose where I went to school so this was interesting to me. I found it strange that parents would hire someone to prep their child for an interview. I also think it's wrong for parents to lie about their address on the application form. It is interesting to see how far parents will go to have their children attend a certain school. The children of these "savvy parents" as Kozol calls them, are very fortunate to have such resources. But I find it unfair to those less fortunate children who deserve the same opportunities.

4 comments:

Kara said...

I agree that assessment is a good way to evaluate whether schools are teaching. However, I feel there is too much emphasis on assessment. The risk of failure puts a lot of pressure on students. If students have different ways of learning, then teachers should accommodate the different ways. The tests should also evaluate the students according to their learning style. This may take away some of the pressure that students feel. For example, if a student is a visual learner, powerpoint presentations may be used by the teacher and the student may have to make a powerpoint presentation instead of a writing test at the end of the semester. I think a key solution is to let teachers be aware of the different learning styles of their students so they can try to create their lessons and exams based on the different styles. If a student is comfortable with the material and is taught well, the student will feel more confident in taking the assessment exam.

alangan1 said...

I really think the idea of students being able to use different learning styles to convey what they have learned is a great way to show what they know in comparison to standardized tests. Its unfortunate that in our society many people aren't aware that not all people learn differently, and that many people are unwilling to change the system, because having all students use different styles would me a lot more work for the teachers. However, if there was some sort of organization, and students with the same styles were grouped together it could be possible.

Anonymous said...

Yea I feel you girl. I never stressed over standardized tests but that was because I never really gave a crap! But for those who did view testing and grades as the only way to ensure success it is a very detrimental experience.I agree with many of the points brought up. Especially the part about students taking tests in gymnasiums and auditoriums. It brought me back into my high school experience. The worse thing in the world is having to feel physically uncomfortable taking an exam to which you are emotionally unprepared and mentally unprepared as well.

Ms. Educated said...

Would you still consider it unfair if you had the same resources?